Original Article By Techno Fog At Substack.com

Today, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz issued a damning new report on the FBI’s “Execution of its Woods Procedures for Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to US Persons.” And it’s damning for the FBI.

Before we get to the Inspector General’s findings, a bit of background is important. The FISA Court is a secret court where the government is present but the accused is not. As IG Horowitz explains:

“Unlike the use of other intrusive investigative techniques (such as wiretaps under Title III and traditional criminal search warrants) that are granted in ex parte hearings but can potentially be subject to later court challenge, FISA orders generally have not been subject to scrutiny through subsequent adversarial proceedings.”

Build Your Website On A Free Speech Hosting Platform:

Because this is an ex parte hearing, the DOJ/FBI have heightened duties of candor. According to the FISA Court’s local rules, the government is to disclose all material facts and correct any misstatements of material facts:

Source: Techno Fog At Substack.com

This latest audit by IG Horowitz focused on the FBI’s compliance with the Woods procedures. For background, he provides this easy summary on how the process works:

Source: Techno Fog At Substack.com

IG Horowitz’s latest audit reviewed 29 sampled FISA applications. He found “that the FBI was not meeting the expectations of its own protocols.” As he reported in March 2020:

“We identified numerous instances of non-compliance with the Woods Procedures in the 25 Woods Files that were made available to us to review; and we reported that the FBI was unable to produce the original version of the remaining 4 Woods Files we requested.”

More damning are the latest discoveries after an audit of more FISA applications. These include:

“over 400 instances of non-compliance with the Woods Procedures in connection with those 29 FISA applications”

“over 7,000 FISA applications authorized between January 2015 and March 2020, there were at least 179 instances in which the Woods File required by FBI policy was missing in whole or in part”

Source: Techno Fog At Substack.com

The more material errors (aside from losing their own files) included:

Source: Techno Fog At Substack.com

All this comes after FBI promises to correct FISA accuracy. In December 2019, after IG Horowitz detailed substantial issues with the Carter Page FISA applications, the FISA Court noted that the misconduct was serious and ordered the FBI to conduct remedial measures to fix the problems of the FBI’s own creation.

Business Websites And Marketing – Affordable Pay-As-You-Go Plans

One can’t help but speculate that the FISA Court won’t do much about these latest issues, aside from ordering the FBI to conduct more training. After all, the then-presiding judge of the FISA Court, Judge Boasberg, refused jail time for FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith after he altered an e-mail and lied about Carter Page’s relationship with the CIA.  

Knowing the history of the FISA Court excusing government misconduct, we present the same question now that we did after the Clinesmith sentencing: What does it say about the FISA Court’s “heightened duty of candor” if there aren’t heightened punishments for violating that duty?

We now have a new question – how could FBI Director Wray allow these abuses to continue?